Jan 27, 2026

Intake Triage is Eating Your Best People

Intake Triage is Eating Your Best People

Intake Triage is Eating Your Best People

Labs don’t go late because technicians are slow. Labs go late because technicians get pulled into detective work.

What the survey showed

Half of the respondents said they spend 2–4 hours/day triaging incoming scans, files, and messages.

That’s not “admin overhead”. That’s your production constraint & bottleneck.

Why triage feels heavier than it looks

Triage is cognitively expensive because it’s interruption-driven work.

Research on fragmented work shows that interrupted tasks often take meaningful time to resume, and people bounce between multiple activities before returning.

This maps eerily well to lab reality:


  • You open the scanner portal

  • Download scan

  • Check email thread

  • Ask for shade photos

  • Realise it might be a remake

  • Try to find the original case

  • Message the clinic

  • Wait

  • Restart


That loop is exactly why intake feels like being busy without making progress.

The deeper problem: “No Definition of Done” for intake

Most labs have a Definition of Done for production:


  • model ready

  • design approved

  • print schedule

  • pack & ship


But intake often has no hard gate. It’s vibes.

So cases leak into production half-formed… and the cost shows up later as remakes, delays, and stress.

What good looks like: a 3-stage intake gate

This is a simple approach you can use even if you’re fully manual.

Gate 1 — Identity


  • Patient + clinic + case type

  • New vs remake vs revision

  • Due date (confirmed)


Gate 2 — Inputs


  • Upper/lower scans present

  • Bite present

  • Photos present if required

  • Rx requirements captured (shade, material, IPR/attachments, special notes)


Gate 3 — Commit


  • If missing: auto-create a “missing list” and assign ownership

  • If complete: move the case into the production queue with confidence


Where tech helps (without being salesy)

Your survey also signals what labs want improved: intake standardisation and better scan submission consistency rank highly.

This is exactly the kind of problem software should solve:


  • Make intake rules explicit

  • Reduce switching

  • Stop half-formed cases from entering production


Download the free UK Lab Pulse one-pager (it includes the benchmark pain points + what labs ranked as priorities):

The Lab Became the Integration Layer (and nobody asked us)

January 27, 2026

Matt Everatt joins as an advisor to Smile Genius

December 18, 2025

A New Chapter for Dentistry’s Shared Operating Layer

December 16, 2025

© 2024 Smile Genius Dental. All rights Reserved.